Abstract

Many problems in introductory Physics require the student to enter a system of algebraic equations as the answer. Tutoring systems must be able to understand the student's submission before they can generate useful feedback. This paper presents an approach that accepts from the student a system of equations describing the physics of the problem and checks to see if it is correct. When it is not, the student's equation set is analyzed vis-a-vis one or more correct sets of equations, known physics concepts, and algebraic transformations. During this analysis credit-blame assignment is performed to identify one of several types of errors including 1) algebraic errors, 2) one or more omitted physics concepts, 3) incorrect instances of a required physics concept, and 4) use of an inappropriate physics concept. Experimental data collected from an introductory physics class is summarized and discussed vis-a-vis other methods. Results indicate that the techniques applied are effective at localizing most errors but that more work is needed to distinguish between algebraic and conceptual errors.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.