Abstract

Many field observations have shown that rock bursts occur frequently near the terminal mining line (TML) and dip coal pillar area in deep coalfaces. Taking the “7.26” rock burst in coalface 3302 in Xingcun Coal Mine as an example, the rock burst mechanism was investigated based on theoretical analysis and field observations, and a combined evaluation method using the stress field under seismic wave excitation was established to determine the reasonable TML of coalface 3302. Firstly, the static geological data revealed during roadway excavation were used for preevaluation of rock burst risk at the working face. By theoretically analyzing the stress transfer mechanism of the two types of the roof structure, the computational model of abutment pressure was established and the calculation method giving the abutment stress was proposed. Subsequently, a dynamic evaluation method that adopts microseismic and stress online monitoring system to monitor dynamic information, such as mine tremors and stress during coalface mining, was developed to define stress anomaly areas and then dynamically determine the TML. Finally, the proposed model was used to optimize the position of the TML of LW3302 in Xingcun Coal Mine; findings obtained in this study provide theoretical guidance for safe coal mining. Combined with the results of theoretical analysis (255 m), online stress monitoring (200 m), microseismic (MS) monitoring (262 m), and passive seismic velocity tomography (220–250 m), it can be finally determined that the width of the protective coal pillar for the TML of coalface 3302 should be at least 262 m.

Highlights

  • At present, more attention has been paid to mineral exploitation at greater depths; for coal resources, current mining activity has reached 1500 m in depth

  • The proposed model was used to optimize the position of the terminal mining line (TML) of LW3302 in Xingcun Coal Mine; findings obtained in this study provide theoretical guidance for safe coal mining

  • Combined with the results of theoretical analysis (255 m), online stress monitoring (200 m), microseismic (MS) monitoring (262 m), and passive seismic velocity tomography (220–250 m), it can be determined that the width of the protective coal pillar for the TML of coalface 3302 should be at least 262 m

Read more

Summary

Introduction

More attention has been paid to mineral exploitation at greater depths; for coal resources, current mining activity has reached 1500 m in depth. For the reasonable determination of the TML, i.e., the design of the protective coal pillar between the coalface and the main dip (rise), it is necessary to ensure that the dip (rise) roadways and chamber groups are not within the range of influence of the advance abutment stress. To gain an in-depth understanding of mining-induced stress field and rock burst mechanisms around the TML, the following work has been conducted, as reported here: first, the basic information pertaining to a case study of Xingcun Coal Mine (XCM), i.e., geological structures, characteristics of the intrinsic coal properties, and site details of panel 3302, was analyzed. Combined with the results of online stress monitoring, microseismic monitoring, and passive seismic velocity tomography, the reasonable position of TML was determined and optimized to obtain a more realistic evaluation of rock burst risk

Stress Distribution around the TML
Abutment Stress Computation for Longwall Panel 3302 in Xingcun Coal Mine
Results
Passive Seismic Velocity Tomography
45 Gravity stress
Reasonable Determination of the TML
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call