Abstract
This article argues that a productive way of studying the legacy of Machiavelli in contemporary international politics is to study works that have sought to assess this legacy already. In effect, we should acknowledge that Machiavelli’s legacy is generally mediated by influential previous readings. I make this argument on textual mediation by engaging the assessment of Machiavelli’s legacy in Walker’s Inside/Outside and After the Globe, Before the World. More precisely, the article documents and analyzes the intertwinement of Walker’s reading of Machiavelli with (and mostly against) that of Leo Strauss. Both Walker and Strauss are concerned with the relationship between Machiavelli’s claims and the notion of a tradition, be it of political philosophy or of international relations. While Walker claims that Machiavelli should be recovered from Straussian accounts of modernity as a radically new order, Strauss claimed that Machiavelli himself should be recovered from his heirs in order to recover from the crisis that he initiated. Crucially, Machiavelli’s own reading of Roman history can be read as a creative recovery, both in the archeological and in the therapeutic sense of the word.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.