Abstract

A Hubbard‐band model is used for analyzing the low‐temperature data of Hall‐effect measurements on weakly compensated n‐GaAs samples with donor concentrations ND less than 1016 cm−3. In the model, not only the bottom Hubbard band formed from the neutral donor states but also the top Hubbard band formed from the negatively charged donor states is taken into account. Nearest‐neighbor hopping (NNH) or Efros‐Shklovskii (ES) variable‐range hopping (VRH) is assumed for conduction in the bottom Hubbard band, depending on ND, while NNH is assumed for conduction in the top Hubbard band. For the sample with ND = 1.3 × 1015 cm−3, it is shown that the Hall mobility is dominated by NNH in the top Hubbard band in the temperature range of 4–15 K while it is dominated by NNH in the bottom Hubbard band below 3 K. For this sample, it is also shown that the absolute value of the Hall coefficient is dominated by the contribution from the top Hubbard band around its peak at 4.4 K. For the samples with ND in the range of 2.7–9 × 1015 cm−3, on the other hand, it is shown that there hardly exists the temperature range in which the conduction in the top Hubbard band dominates.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.