Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with metastatic nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer after progression on standard-of-care therapy in the United States

Abstract

ObjectivesData to guide treatment selection in metastatic nonsquamous (mNSq) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after progression on current standard-of-care (SoC) treatment are limited. We investigated patterns of treatment and clinical outcomes following one or more disease progressions on SoC. Materials and methodsElectronic medical records in the ConcertAI Patient360 NSCLC database were analyzed for US adults with mNSq NSCLC who initiated treatment between 2016 and 2021. Analyses were conducted separately for patients who had ≥1 prior lines of therapy and progression(s) without (Cohort 1) or with (Cohort 2) evidence of targetable genetic alterations (EGFR, ALK, or ROS1). Outcomes included real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) and overall survival (rwOS). ResultsCohorts 1 and 2 included 281 and 109 patients, respectively. In Cohort 1, subsequent treatment was most often with docetaxel monotherapy (18.5%) or docetaxel + ramucirumab (32.4%). Most patients in Cohort 2 received platinum-based doublet chemotherapy with (22.9%) or without (34.9%) immunotherapy. Median rwPFS and rwOS were 2.9 and 7.2 months, respectively, in Cohort 1, and 3.2 and 10.4 months in Cohort 2. Neither the addition of ramucirumab to docetaxel in Cohort 1 nor the addition of immunotherapy to chemotherapy in Cohort 2 was associated with a marked improvement in additional survival. ConclusionPatients with progressive mNSq NSCLC most commonly received later-line docetaxel for cancer without driver mutations, or platinum-based chemotherapy (following one or more lines of tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy) for cancer with driver mutations, consistent with guideline recommendations. Median survival was poor regardless of subsequent treatment, highlighting the need for more effective options.