Abstract

<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">The gap between the officially reported CO<sub>2</sub> values and the actual performance of the vehicle on the road is continuously increasing. Numerous studies are showing differences between the official values and the real-world measurements of more than 40% in average, with further increases year by year.</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">The fuel consumption of passenger cars are determined as part of the vehicle certification according to Euro 6 via carbon mass balance using exhaust gas measurement.</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">By introducing the new world harmonized driving cycle (WLTC) in September 2017, which is addressing a more realistic speed profile or traffic conditions, the gap between the certification and road test is expected to be reduced in half.</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">Additionally the EU Commission plans to monitor vehicles more closely. From 2020, devices for recording fuel and energy consumption will become mandatory in all passenger cars and light commercial vehicles, reflecting the average real world CO<sub>2</sub> emissions.</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">During the type approval the OEMs have to prove that these so called ‘<i>On-board Fuel and/or Energy Consumption Monitoring Device</i>’ (‘OBFCM device’) is not deviating more than +/-5% compared to the fuel consumption value calculated from the carbon mass balance.</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">OBFCM means that by using already existing devices in the vehicle, like the ECU, the quantity of fuel and/or electric energy used is being determined and stored.</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">This is obviously a challenging target considering a typically uncertainty of the carbon mass balance determination of +/-3% with reference to precise direct fuel flow measurement.</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">The most important task will be to achieve an accurate reference value for the ECU calibration via direct fuel flow measurement.</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">The target of the paper is a comparison of the indirect methods of carbon mass balance as well as ECU fuel consumption determination and the direct fuel flow measurement by means of measurement uncertainty considerations and actual measurements.</div></div>

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call