Abstract

Azilsartan (AZ), azilsartan/chlorthalidone (AZ/CLD) and diltiazem-extended release (TXC) have been shown to significantly decrease blood pressure (BP) in randomized controlled trials. Effectiveness in the real-world setting has not been extensively reported. This analysis describes the effectiveness of AZ, AZ/CLD and TXC in hypertension management in a Canadian community-care setting. CV-CARE is a multi-center, community-based registry enrolling patients with cardio metabolic disorders including hypertension, treated with AZ, AZ/CLD and/or TXC. We assessed changes in systolic (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) over 12 months. Achieved BPs were stratified into three groups: SBP/DBP: A: <140/90 mmHg; B: <130/80 mmHg; and C: <120/80 mmHg. A total of 1,656 patients have been enrolled to date (AZ: n=1,087; AZ/CLD: n=423; TXC: n=146) of which 530 have 12-month follow-ups. TXC patients had the longest mean disease duration (9.0±9.94 years) when compared to AZ/CLD (5.8±6.61 years) and AZ (4.0±6.47 years) patients (p<0.001). Although the majority of patients entered into the study were medicated for their hypertension, mean baseline BP was above 150/90 mm Hg. The results from Table 1 show that baseline parameters were similar for the three treatments. At month 12, clinically and statistically significant SBP and DBP reductions were observed for AZ (-21.9/-11.2 mmHg), AZ/CLD (-23.1/-11.4 mmHg) and TXC (-15.9/-6.8 mmHg). Across all three medications, 59-76% achieved strata A, 17-29% achieved strata B, but only 6-15% achieved strata C at month 12. At month 12, only 13% had changes in study drug, with 2.2% switching to a new drug and 3.8% discontinuing, suggesting a good efficacy and tolerability. The most frequent reason for treatment change was inadequate BP control (AZ: 73.7%; AZ/CLD: 71.4%; p=0.747). Both monotherapy and combination therapy patients had significant (p<0.001) reductions in BP and pulse (monotherapy; combination: -2.7 bpm; -2.5 bpm) over 12 months of treatment. The most commonly reported baseline comorbidity was type 2 diabetes among patients treated with AZ (18.3%) and AZ/CLD (22.7%) while dyslipidemia was most frequent among TXC patients (50.7%). In a real-world setting, treatment of hypertension is sub-optimal. This study shows that AZ, AZ/CLD and TXC fulfill an unmet medical need, as these treatments were effective in reducing BP and achieving conventional BP targets.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call