Abstract

Course-based research experiences (CREs) are designed to engage students in authentic scientific experiences that are embedded into a standard curriculum. CREs provide valuable research experiences to large numbers of undergraduate biology students, however, CRE implementation can require many personnel. Because limited personnel may be a barrier to widespread CRE implementation, our goal was to discover which personnel students valued throughout a CRE and the ways they were valuable. We investigated students’ perceptions of personnel resources throughout a semester-long CRE using two survey approaches. Using a text message survey administered multiple times per week, real-time data was collected about which personnel resource students perceived to be the most helpful. Using a web-based survey administered five times throughout the semester, retrospective data was collected about how often students used each personnel resource and how helpful students perceived each personnel resource to be. Graduate teaching assistants (TAs) were consistently selected as the most helpful personnel resource by the majority of respondents throughout the semester, with most respondents describing graduate TAs providing project-specific feedback. Although less frequently, undergraduate TAs were also consistently selected as the most helpful personnel resource. Respondents described undergraduate TAs providing project-specific feedback, general feedback, and project-specific resources. Data from the retrospective, web-based survey largely mirrored the real-time, text message survey data. Throughout the semester, most respondents reported using graduate TAs “Often” or “Always” and that graduate TAs were “Very” or “Extremely” helpful. Throughout most of the semester, most respondents also reported using undergraduate TAs “Often” or “Always” and that undergraduate TAs were “Very” or “Extremely” helpful. The results of this descriptive study underscore the importance of graduate and undergraduate TAs in the development and implementation of CREs, emphasizing the need for departments and course coordinators to be intentional in planning TA training that prepares TAs to fulfill their critical role in CRE implementation.

Highlights

  • Numerous biology education stakeholders have called for evidence-based teaching and learning in undergraduate biology classrooms

  • Because limited personnel may be a barrier to widespread course-based research experiences (CREs) implementation, our goal was to discover which personnel students valued throughout a CRE and the ways they were valuable

  • A core recommendation in this report was to “advocate and provide support for replacing standard laboratory courses with discovery-based research courses”. These and other recommendations [4] have led to the implementation -based research experiences (CREs) in undergraduate biology courses

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Numerous biology education stakeholders have called for evidence-based teaching and learning in undergraduate biology classrooms. One element of these calls includes engaging all undergraduate students in research experiences in their courses [1, 2]. A core recommendation in this report was to “advocate and provide support for replacing standard laboratory courses with discovery-based research courses”. These and other recommendations [4] have led to the implementation -based research experiences (CREs) in undergraduate biology courses. While CREs can consist of slightly different elements [5, 6], most include a discovery-based, hands-on research experience embedded within a course, ranging from a few weeks [7, 8] to a full semester in length [9]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call