Abstract

There is some controversy about the value of fetal MRI in prenatal diagnosis, and most of the studies examine its accuracy in central nervous system (CNS) pathology. The objective of this retrospective study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy and usefulness of fetal MRI in the prenatal diagnosis of central nervous system (CNS) pathology and non-CNS pathology. Patients referred to the Radiology Department between 2007 and 2018 for a fetal MRI after detection of an anomaly in the fetal ultrasound, a high-risk pregnancy, or an inconclusive fetal ultrasound (n = 623) were included in the study. Postnatal diagnosis was used to assess the diagnostic accuracy of MRI. Fetal MRI was considered to provide additional information over fetal ultrasound when findings of the fetal MRI were not detected in the fetal ultrasound or when established a pathological condition that was not detected in the fetal ultrasound. Fetal MRI provided useful information for the perinatal management and prognosis over fetal ultrasound when findings of the fetal MRI changed the postnatal prognosis, leaded to the decision to legally terminate the pregnancy, changed prenatal or postnatal follow-up, or helped in the planning of prenatal or postnatal treatment. Fetal MRI offered an accurate diagnosis in 97% of cases (compared to 90.4% of fetal ultrasound; p < 0.001). Concordance between fetal ultrasound and fetal MRI was 92.1%. Fetal MRI provided additional information over fetal ultrasound in 23.1% of cases. In 11.6% of cases, the information was useful for the perinatal management and prognosis. In 45 cases (7.2%), fetal MRI was the only accurate diagnosis. In conclusion, fetal MRI has a superior diagnostic accuracy, especially in CNS pathology, and provides additional useful information in CNS, thoracic, and abdominal pathology.

Highlights

  • Fetal ultrasound has been described as the first-line diagnostic examination to identify prenatal congenital abnormalities [1], and the majority of fetal ultrasound examinations are diagnostic

  • A total of 694 pregnant women were attended in our hospital for a fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) complementary to fetal ultrasound between January 2007 and December 2018

  • Diagnostic Accuracy and Fetal MRI and Fetal Ultrasound Concordance. e diagnostic accuracy of the fetal ultrasound and the fetal MRI and the concordance between the two tests are shown in Table 3. e diagnostic accuracy of the fetal MRI was higher than that of fetal ultrasound in all cases and all indications. e differences in diagnostic accuracy between fetal ultrasound and fetal MRI were significant for all cases (90.4% vs 97%; p < 0.001) and for central nervous system (CNS) pathology (89.7% vs 98.1%; p < 0.001)

Read more

Summary

Research Article

Manuel Recio Rodrıguez ,1 Cristina Andreu-Vazquez, Israel J. Ere is some controversy about the value of fetal MRI in prenatal diagnosis, and most of the studies examine its accuracy in central nervous system (CNS) pathology. E objective of this retrospective study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy and usefulness of fetal MRI in the prenatal diagnosis of central nervous system (CNS) pathology and non-CNS pathology. Fetal MRI offered an accurate diagnosis in 97% of cases (compared to 90.4% of fetal ultrasound; p < 0.001). Fetal MRI provided additional information over fetal ultrasound in 23.1% of cases. Fetal MRI has a superior diagnostic accuracy, especially in CNS pathology, and provides additional useful information in CNS, thoracic, and abdominal pathology

Introduction
Diffusionweighted imaging
Results
Ultrasound not valid due to poor acoustic window Placental pathology
Diagnostic accuracy relative to postnatal diagnosis
Hepatic calcifications
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call