Real-world (RW) outcomes for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) patients (pts) with EGFR exon 19 deletions (x19del) stratified by deletion size.

Abstract

9591 Background: EGFR x19dels are well-established targetable drivers in NSCLC. Historically x19dels have been treated as a single group, but it’s unclear whether responses vary for distinct subtypes. We compared demographic, clinical and genomic characteristics as well as outcomes to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for aNSCLC pts with x19dels of varying lengths using a RW Clinico-Genomic Database (CGDB). Methods: Eligible pts had a diagnosis of aNSCLC, received care within the Flatiron Health network between 1/2011-9/2019, and had comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) by Foundation Medicine. Clinical characteristics, treatment history and RW progression were obtained via technology-enabled abstraction as previously described (Singal G, JAMA 2019). x19del length was evaluated for association with overall survival (OS) and RW progression-free survival (rwPFS) with Kaplan-Meier analysis and unadjusted/adjusted (practice type, gender, age at TKI start, EGFR TKI type, race) hazard ratios (HR/aHR) from Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for survival bias. Results: Among 6,577 aNSCLC pts, EGFR x19dels were detected in 336 cases (5%). E746_A750del was the most frequent (214; 64%) and generally 5 amino acid (aa) deletions (x19del-5) were the most common (241; 72%). Other deletions (x19del-other) of 6 (61; 18%), 3 (20; 6%), 4 (11; 3%) or 8 aa (3; 1%) were also observed. Among pts treated with 1st-line EGFR TKI monotherapy after CGP, the x19del-5 (n = 70) cohort was more frequently female compared to x19del-other (n = 27) (90% vs 59%, p = 0.001). No statistically significant differences in the frequency of co-occurring alterations were observed, specifically for genes associated with response to EGFR TKI response such as CTNNB1 (14% vs 19%) and PIK3CA (10% vs 15%). 1st line EGFR TKIs used were similar for x19del-5 vs x19del-other (43% vs 41% osimertinib, 30% vs 37% erlotinib, 24% vs 22% afatinib, 3% vs 0% gefitinib). x19del-5 pts had similar median rwPFS (10.6 vs 10.6 months, HR: 0.73 [0.41-1.28], aHR:0.78 [0.38-1.59]) and median OS (29.2 vs 24.9 months, HR: 0.64 [0.32- 1.29], aHR: 0.75 [0.32-1.75]) compared to x19del-other. Conclusions: In a RW CGDB of 336 aNSCLC pts with EGFR x19dels, 5 aa x19dels were most common (71%) and 29% of cases had 3, 4, 6 or 8 aa x19dels . For pts included in the treatment cohort, no significant differences in rwPFS or OS were observed. These results suggest that x19del length does not significantly impact clinical outcomes to 1st-line EGFR TKIs.