Abstract

IntroductionMedication persistence has rarely been studied for integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI)-based regimens among patients living HIV (PLWH) in Asia. This study investigated medication persistence for newly prescribed INSTI-based regimens in Japan by comparing single-tablet regimens (STRs) versus multiple-tablet regimens (MTRs), based on the Medical Data Vision database. MethodsAdult PLWH with ≥2 claims for antiretroviral therapy (ART) of interest between 1 January 2017 and 30 June 2018 were included if they had a ≥3-month continuous enrolment prior to the index date and a ≥6-month follow-up after the index date. Medication persistence was measured as the duration from initiation to discontinuation of the prescribed INSTI-based regimen. ResultsOverall, 487 patients were included, with 220 in the STR cohort and 267 in the MTR cohort. Persistence was longer in the STR cohort than in the MTR cohort (mean days on the index regimens: 384.2 vs. 317.3, P < 0.001). MTRs were associated with a higher risk of discontinuation than STRs (hazard ratio [HR], 1.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18–2.52; P = 0.005). Other factors that were associated with discontinuation were backbone (emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate vs. emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide: HR, 5.64; 95% CI, 3.68–8.66; P < 0.001), third agent (raltegravir vs. elvitegravir/cobicistat: HR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.10–3.86; P = 0.024), age (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01–1.03; P = 0.007), and the number of non-ART index medications (HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.12–1.21; P < 0.001). ConclusionsAmong PLWH newly prescribed an INSTI-based regimen in Japan, STRs were associated with longer persistence than MTRs.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.