Real World Experience of Letermovir (LTV) Prophylaxis (Px) for the Prevention of Cytomegalovirus Infection (CMVi) in the Adult CMV Seropositive Recipients (R+) of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (HCT) Patients (pts).

Abstract

CMVi leads to significant morbidity in R+ HCT and preemptive therapy (PET) has been the standard of care. LTV was FDA-approved in Nov. 2017 for CMVi prevention in R+ HCT. Besides the clinical trials, there is are real world data on LTV. Upon IRB approval, we retrospectively studied consecutive R+ HCT pts with their first HCT between 1/1/2017 and 6/30/2018. LTV group included pts with HCT between 2/20/18 and 6/30/2018, who had LTV Px started within 28 days of HCT (n=59), and R+ HCT between 1/1/2017 and 2/19/2018 (n=307) served as control (ctrl). We compared CMVi rates in first 100 days of HCT, and time to engraftment between the 2 groups. Risk stratification: high risk - haplo/cord HCT & ATG use, low risk - all others. CMVi was defined as viral load (VL) of 625 IU/ml to 1250 IU/ml or higher (CMV assay conversion factor of 1 genomic copy/ml = 2.5 IU/ml). CMV VL less than 625 IU/ml is reported negative, VL between 625 and 1250 IU/ml is qualitative positive but numeric value is provided only for VL ≥ 1250 IU/ml. PET was recommended for VL >1250 IU/ml (500 copies/ml) in high risk and > 3750 IU/ml (1500 copies/ml) in low risk HCT (including those on LTV requiring PET). Descriptive statistics was done for baseline characteristics. Cumulative incidence curves were generated for CMVi within 100 days post-HCT and Gray's test was used to compare the difference between the 2 groups. In both groups, median age was 54 years and HCT indications were similar. Donor type in LTV/ Ctrl groups: MRD (27 vs 36%), MUD (44 vs 47%), haplo (27 vs 15%), cord (1.7 vs 1.6%). PBMC was graft source in 90% of both groups. Myeloablative conditioning: 40.7% in LTV and 35% in Ctrl. GVHD Px: Cellcept (32 vs 25%), methotrexate (7 vs 9%), tacro/siro (58 vs 65), and others (3.4 vs 0.3%) in LTV & Ctrl respectively. A majority (n=36) received both intravenous & oral LTV formulation while 23 received oral only. Median time from HCT to LTV start was 13 days (range: 4-26). LTV group had significant reduction in CMVi rate (22.4% [95%CI: 12.7-34.0]) compared with ctrl group (41.1% [95%CI: 35.4-46.7], p=0.008, Fig 1). In a subgroup of high-risk HCT LTV was significantly reduced CMVi rate (22.2%) compared with ctrl (62.8%, p=0.004, Fig 2) while statistical difference was not reached in low-risk HCT pts (22.8% vs. 35.6%, p=0.11). In the LTV Px, clinically significant (CS)-CMVi requiring PET occurred in 8.4% (n=5) and on excluding 2 pts who were not on LTV at the time of CMVi, the rate was 5% (Fig 1). CMVi cleared without PET in 8/13 LTV pts and LTV was continued; all pts had VL LTV use in a real world setting is associated with significant reduction of CMVi and CS-CMVi without any discernible myelosuppression. The low level CMVi resolved spontaneously in majority with continued LTV Px and PET was not necessary. The high-risk HCT had most benefit with LTV Px.