Abstract

BackgroundDisease-modifying therapies (DMTs) can alter multiple sclerosis (MS) disease course.Peak prevalence age for people with MS (pwMS) has increased, but little is known about MS clinical course or DMT response in older pwMS.The objective of this retrospective analysis of a US administrative claims database to was to evaluate MS disease course, DMT use, healthcare utilisation, and time to relapse during follow-up, in pwMS ≥50 years with active disease. MethodsInclusion criteria were ≥3 years’ continuous enrolment, ≥1 MS relapse (index event), and age ≥50 years. Baseline period was 1 year prior to index event. Follow-up was 2 years.Two patient categories were considered: (i) not under DMT treatment at index date (untreated group) and (ii) under DMT treatment at index date (treated group). ResultsFollowing propensity score matching there were 3,869 patients in the treated and 3,869 patients in the untreated groups.The untreated group numerically spent more days in hospital than the treated group (9.4 vs 7.8 days) and had more emergency room (ER)/urgent care visits (1.3 vs 1.0 visits).There were no observed differences in time to relapse between groups.At index relapse, pwMS were treated with glatiramer acetate (29%), interferons (27%), oral DMTs (29%), or intravenous DMTs (15%). During follow-up, 32% of the untreated group were treated with a DMT, mostly intravenous and oral DMTs. DMT treatment remained largely unchanged in the treated group. ConclusionDMTs may provide shorter hospital stays and less frequent ER visits in older pwMS with active MS. Treatment inertia after relapse was high.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.