Abstract

This paper proposes a novel parametric identification approach for linear systems using Deep Learning (DL) and the Modified Relay Feedback Test (MRFT). The proposed methodology utilizes MRFT to reveal distinguishing frequencies about an unknown process; which are then passed to a trained DL model to identify the underlying process parameters. The presented approach guarantees stability and performance in the identification and control phases respectively, and requires few seconds of observation data to infer the dynamic system parameters. Quadrotor Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) attitude and altitude dynamics were used in simulation and experimentation to verify the presented methodology. Results show the effectiveness and real-time capabilities of the proposed approach, which outperforms the conventional Prediction Error Method in terms of accuracy, robustness to biases, computational efficiency and data requirements.

Highlights

  • Since the third industrial revolution, system identification has been a key element in the development of autonomous technologies in a wide set of industrial applications

  • We show that this identification method can be performed in real-time such that a Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) adapts to changes to its own physical dynamics during a flight mission

  • Simulation results are compared against prediction error methods (PEM) as a well-established system identification method and the non-parametric tuning rules as an optimal controller design criteria

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Since the third industrial revolution, system identification has been a key element in the development of autonomous technologies in a wide set of industrial applications. To meet the aforementioned requirements of autonomy, extensive research has been carried out to develop effective methods of system identification and adaptation These methods are generally classified as parametric or non-parametric depending on the control requirements and design constraints. Several studies in the literature applied these techniques to UAV operation with accurate identification results [18]–[23] These methods require extensive data generation and accurate selection of optimizer initial conditions, which demand human experience and cause susceptibility to data biases and overfitting. Most of these methods are computationally expensive and not suitable for real-time applications; they are instead applied offline to process an abundance of previously collected flight or operational data [18]–[22]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call