Abstract

While fungal infections cause considerable morbidity and mortality, the performance of the current diagnostic tests for fungal infection is low. Even though fungal metagenomics or targeted next-generation sequencing have been investigated for various clinical samples, the real-time clinical utility of these methods still needs to be elucidated. In this study, we used internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and D1-D3 ribosomal DNA nanopore amplicon metagenomic sequencing to assess its utility in patients with fungal infections. Eighty-four samples from seventy-three patients were included and categorized into ‘Fungal infection,’ ‘Fungal colonization,’ and ‘Fungal contamination’ groups based on the judgement of infectious disease specialists. In the ‘Fungal infection’ group, forty-seven initial samples were obtained from forty-seven patients. Three fungal cases detected not by the sequencing but by conventional fungal assays were excluded from the analysis. In the remaining cases, the conventional fungal assay-negative/sequencing-positive group (n=11) and conventional fungal assay-positive/sequencing-positive group (n=33) were compared. Non-Candida and non-Aspergillus fungi infections were more frequent in the conventional-negative/sequencing-positive group (p-value = 0.031). We demonstrated the presence of rare human pathogens, such as Trichosporon asahii and Phycomyces blakesleeanus. In the ‘Fungal infection’ group and ‘Fungal colonization’ group, sequencing was faster than culturing (mean difference = 4.92 days, p-value < 0.001/ mean difference = 4.67, p-value <0.001). Compared to the conventional diagnostic methods including culture, nanopore amplicon sequencing showed a shorter turnaround time and a higher detection rate for uncommon fungal pathogens.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call