Real-Life Experiences with Telaprevir in the Treatment of Chronic Genotype 1 Hepatitis C — The TEPS Study

Abstract

As one of the first Direct Acting Antivirals (DAA), the protease inhibitor Telaprevir (TVR) was available in the European Union from 9/2011 until 9/2016 as a new treatment option for chronic Hepatitis C. Aim. To assess the implementation of therapy stopping rules or shortening of the treatment and their impact on sustained virological response (SVR), as well as the safety and efficacy of the TVR-based therapy during routine daily treatment of patients in Germany. Materials and Methods. 802 patients were assessed (272 treatment naïve, 520 pre-treated) in the noninterventional, multi-center study. Results. 56.6 % of the patients achieved SVR. SVR rate was higher in patients with relapse after previous treatment (68.0 %) than in patients with a previous null-response (31.1 %) and in previously untreated patients (58.1 %). Stopping rule conditions were fulfilled by 3.2 % of patients and it was implemented in 65.4 % of these. 34.3 % of the patients fulfilled the conditions for a therapy shortening. This rule was adhered to in 48.4 % of these, in 34.5 % it was not adhered to. Thus recommendations were not always being followed. Therapy shortening was considered more frequently in previously untreated (54.8 %) than for previously treated patients (24.2 %). Stopping rule application but not shortened treatment reduced therapy costs. Conclusion. The TVR-based therapy represented a breakthrough at that time. Further DAAs have been added as therapeutic options since, increasing the complexity of treatment choice and correct implementation. They represent both an opportunity and a challenge for all those involved. As one of the first Direct Acting Antivirals (DAA), the protease inhibitor Telaprevir (TVR) was available in the European Union from 9/2011 until 9/2016 as a new treatment option for chronic Hepatitis C.Aim. To assess the implementation of therapy stopping rules or shortening of the treatment and their impact on sustained virological response (SVR), as well as the safety and efficacy of the TVR-based therapy during routine daily treatment of patients in Germany.Materials and Methods. 802 patients were assessed (272 treatment naïve, 520 pre-treated) in the noninterventional, multi-center study.Results. 56.6 % of the patients achieved SVR. SVR rate was higher in patients with relapse after previous treatment (68.0 %) than in patients with a previous null-response (31.1 %) and in previously untreated patients (58.1 %). Stopping rule conditions were fulfilled by 3.2 % of patients and it was implemented in 65.4 % of these. 34.3 % of the patients fulfilled the conditions for a therapy shortening. This rule was adhered to in 48.4 % of these, in 34.5 % it was not adhered to. Thus recommendations were not always being followed. Therapy shortening was considered more frequently in previously untreated (54.8 %) than for previously treated patients (24.2 %). Stopping rule application but not shortened treatment reduced therapy costs.Conclusion. The TVR-based therapy represented a breakthrough at that time. Further DAAs have been added as therapeutic options since, increasing the complexity of treatment choice and correct implementation. They represent both an opportunity and a challenge for all those involved.