Abstract

For some time now, rhetors have steadily gained a firm hold on postcolonial African fiction in various versions of what narratologists designate as extradiegetic narrators. One such guise is the communal voice because of the rhetorical advantages these rhetors enjoy as the centre of social, historical, and political consciousness. Yet, in spite of the rhetors’ pervasiveness in postcolonial African prose, little has been said in African critical practice about these fascinating narrative agents since most of the emphasis has been on canonical African texts – what Lindfors designates as the ‘long drums and canons’. Happily, the end of the twentieth century saw a shift in the concerns of African criticism, bringing narratological criteria to bear on postcolonial African fiction. This article theorises the deployment of the rhetor in Two thousand seasons, arguing that the rhetor is privileged because of the ideological force he assumes and his authoritative point of view. It is intended as a contribution to the study of narratology in the African novel, revealing the significance of the rhetorical strategies that guarantee the future of the rhetor as an agency in postcolonial African fiction. For these reasons, this discussion supports a critical discourse of African texts that is, in Culler’s words,‘a poetics, a study of the conditions of meaning’ in postcolonial African fiction.

Highlights

  • Read online: Scan this QR code with your smart phone or mobile device to read online

  • In spite of the rhetors’ pervasiveness in postcolonial African prose, little has been said in African critical practice about these fascinating narrative agents since most of the emphasis has been on canonical African texts – what Lindfors designates as the ‘long drums and canons’

  • The end of the twentieth century saw a shift in the concerns of African criticism, bringing narratological criteria to bear on postcolonial African fiction

Read more

Summary

Original Research

Reading the rhetor in postcolonial African fiction: Armah’s Two thousand seasons as an illustration. What is relevant to this discussion is what Cummings (2005:1–37) discusses as ‘the multidisciplinary nature of pragmatics’, starting from Austin and Searle, and developed by Habermas in the way McCarthy (1978:283) formulates it; that ‘from the point of view of a theory of communicative action, the keystone of theory of speech acts is an explanation of the illocutionary force proper to performative utterances, that is, of their power to generate the interpersonal relations intended by the speaker.’ The totality of these ‘acts’ in Two thousand seasons, as will be seen, are perlocutionary acts, which Huang (2007:103) explains, concern ‘the effect an utterance http://www.literator.org.za may have on the addressee’. It is a text in which the rhetor expresses intense negative feelings towards colonialism In expressing this ire, the novel often employs speech acts that generate specific information to implore its intended African readers to perform certain actions, and, to see specific ideological results both for themselves and against the West. Evocative language’ and this language ‘can arouse [in the intended reader] emotions and feelings’

The rhetor as narrative strategy
The future of the rhetor in African fiction
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call