Abstract

While phonological impairments are common in developmental dyslexia, there has recently been much debate as to whether there is a causal link between the phonological difficulties and the reading problem. An alternative suggestion has been gaining ground that the core deficit in dyslexia is in visual attentional mechanisms. If so, the visual aetiology may be at any of a number of sites along the afferent magnocellular pathway or in the dorsal cortical stream that are all essential for a visuo-spatial attentional feedback to the primary visual cortex. It has been suggested that the same circuits and pathways of top-down attention used for serial visual search are used for reading. Top-down signals from the dorsal parietal areas to primary visual cortex serially highlight cortical locations representing successive letters in a text before they can be recognized and concatenated into a word. We had shown in non-human primates that the mechanism of such a top-down feedback in a visual attention task uses synchronized neuronal oscillations at the lower end of the gamma frequency range. It is no coincidence that reading graphemes in a text also happens at the low gamma frequencies. The basic proposal here is that each cycle of gamma oscillation focuses an attentional spotlight on the primary visual cortical representation of just one or two letters before sequential recognition of letters and their concatenation into word strings. The timing, period, envelope, amplitude, and phase of the synchronized oscillations modulating the incoming signals in the striate cortex would have a profound influence on the accuracy and speed of reading. Thus, the general temporal sampling difficulties in dyslexic subjects may impact reading not necessarily by causing phonological deficits, but by affecting the spatio-temporal parsing of the visual input within the visual system before these signals are used for letter and word recognition.

Highlights

  • For nearly three decades, the dominant model to explain the reading difficulties experienced by those with developmental dyslexia (DD) was one that was phonologically based (Bradley and Bryant, 1983; Goswami and Bryant, 1990; Stanovich, 1998; Shaywitz and Shaywitz, 2005; Ziegler and Goswami, 2005; Goswami, 2011). This was supported by the profound deficits in phonological skills and in phonemic awareness commonly found to be associated with dyslexia, and by the findings of temporal processing difficulties in the auditory system that provided a possible neuronal basis for the phonological theory (Tallal, 1980; Ahissar et al, 2000; Temple et al, 2000; Breier et al, 2001). These findings were integrated with a host of studies on neuronal oscillatory mechanisms that are relevant for temporal sampling of speech and were applied to DD in a model termed the “temporal sampling framework” (TSF) by Goswami (2011)

  • The development of writing and reading was a cultural programme in human history that happened to exploit a mechanism that had evolved for covert serial visual search

  • This is consistent with the findings that with acoustic stimuli, there is an impairment of oscillations in the low gamma range in DD (Giraud and Poeppel, 2012)

Read more

Summary

HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE

Reading into neuronal oscillations in the visual system: implications for developmental dyslexia. Edited by: Usha Goswami, University of Cambridge, UK Andrea Facoetti, Università di Padova, Italy Marie Lallier, Basque Center on Cognition Brain and Language, Spain Alan J. Top-down signals from the dorsal parietal areas to primary visual cortex serially highlight cortical locations representing successive letters in a text before they can be recognized and concatenated into a word. We had shown in non-human primates that the mechanism of such a top-down feedback in a visual attention task uses synchronized neuronal oscillations at the lower end of the gamma frequency range. The basic proposal here is that each cycle of gamma oscillation focuses an attentional spotlight on the primary visual cortical representation of just one or two letters before sequential recognition of letters and their concatenation into word strings.

INTRODUCTION
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call