Abstract
This experiment compared self-paced reading time and comprehension for subjects who read both paper-and computer-displayed passages. Reading time was longer and comprehension was less accurate for computer presentation than for paper presentation, but only when subjects were tested on the computer-presented texts first. These data raise the possibility that the processes involved in reading video text may not be comparable to traditional reading, especially without extensive practice on a given task. It is suggested that data from computer-controlled reading experiments that use relatively brief testing sessions should be viewed with caution.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
