Abstract

The purpose of this study is to realize the full core conversion from the use of High Enriched Uranium (HEU) fuels to the use of Low Enriched Uranium (LEU) fuels in Kyoto University Research Reactor (KUR). Although the conversion of nuclear energy sources is required to keep the safety margins and reactor reliability based on KUR HEU core, the uranium density (3.2gU/cm3) and enrichment (20%) of LEU fuel (U3Si2–AL) are quite different from the uranium density (0.58gU/cm3) and enrichment (93%) of HEU fuel (U–Al), which may result in the changes of heat transfer response and neutronic characteristic in the core. So it is necessary to objectively re-assess the feasibility of LEU silicide fuel core in KUR by using various numerical simulation codes. This paper established a detailed simulation model for the LEU silicide core and provided the safety analyses for the reactivity insertion transients in the core by using EUREKA-2/RR code. Although the EUREKA-2/RR code is a proven and trusted code, its validity was further confirmed by the comparison with the predictions from another two thermal hydraulic codes, COOLOD-N2 and THYDE-W at steady state operation. The steady state simulation also verified the feasibility of KUR to be operated at rated thermal power of 5MW. In view of the core loading patterns, the operational conditions and characteristics of the reactor protection system in KUR, the accidental control rod withdrawal transients at natural circulation and forced circulation modes, the cold water injection induced reactivity insertion transient and the reactivity insertion transient due to removal of irradiation samples were conservatively analyzed and their transient characteristic parameters such as core power, fuel temperature, cladding temperature, primary coolant temperature and departure from nucleate boiling ratio (DNBR) due to the different ways and magnitudes of reactivity insertions were focused in this study. The analytical results indicate that the quick power excursions initiated by the reactivity insertion can be safely suppressed by the reactor protection system of KUR in various initial power levels and different operational modes (natural circulation and forced circulation modes). No boiling and no burnout on fuel cladding surface and no blister in the fuel meat happens and KUR is safe in all of these reactivity insertion transients if the reactor protection system of KUR works in its minimum degree.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.