Abstract
AbstractThe catalytic oxidation of fluorene to 9‐fluorenone in a fluidized‐bed reactor was investigated by modeling of the reactor and simulation of its performance. The “Bubble Assemblage Model” of Kato and Wen, the “Bubbling Bed Model” of Kunii and Levenspiel and the “Countercurrent Backmixing Model” of Potter were applied. From a comparison of simulation results obtained by the various fluidized‐bed models and a fixed‐bed model conclusions were drawn about the influence of interphase mass transfer and gas backmixing on the conversion of fluorene and slectivity of 9‐fluorenone formation. Furthermore, the dependence of conversion and selectivity on temperature and hydrodynamic conditions was investigated. In particular, the implications of a change of hydrodynamic conditions for scale‐up were analysed. The highest yield of 9‐fluorenone predicted for a bench‐scale fluidized bed amounted to 88% (XF = 97%, SNON = 91%). This yield was lower than in a fixed‐bed reactor (YNON = 92%, XF = 99%, SNON = 93%). A further drop of the yield was predicted when scaling‐up from a bench‐scale reactor to a commercial size unit (YNON = 54%, XF = 86%, SNON = 63%).
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.