Abstract
Major failures of UK temporary works have almost disappeared since BS 5975 was published in 1982, following the Bragg report in 1975 into recent falsework disasters in which many lost their lives. But with the replacement of British standards by EuroNorms, could such failures inevitably recur? BS 5975 is ‘British’ in style: its comprehensive guidance appeals to reasonableness and the exercise of judgement. Not every detail of site operations can be foreseen in the design office, so coordinating the inter-relationship between designer and constructor is critical. This contrasts with the style of the EuroNorms, in which reliance is placed on highly analytical methods and low factors of safety. The paper compares BS 5975 in detail with the EuroNorm for falsework, BS EN 12812, expressing concern about the dependence on analysis and the absence of guidance on procedural control. The introduction of the structural Eurocodes also presents a fundamental challenge to the construction industry. At a time when those who grew up with Bragg are retiring from the industry, the paper re-visits Bragg's recommendations and sets a fresh agenda to maintain and improve safety in the industry as the EuroNorms are adopted.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Forensic Engineering
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
