Abstract
ABSTRACT In this article, we analyse reforms of academic quality assurance in light of organizational theory using the case example of Finnish higher education. Our purpose is to shed light on the processes behind repeated reforms and the motivation to continuously modify quality models that have only been in use for a relatively short period of time. In our discussion, we propose interpreting the continuous change and strong differentiation of quality management in a positive light. The development, alteration, and promotion of quality management can be considered an attempt at continuous self-improvement; they also significantly contribute to (reform-driven) communication about quality. The changes also serve a number of other functions, which we discuss in the final section of our paper.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
