Abstract
We have studied the Re-Os isotope systematics of komatiite-related Ni-Cu-PGE sulfide deposits in Finland, including the Archean Ruossakero Ni-(Cu), Vaara Ni-(Cu-PGE), Tainiovaara Ni-(Cu-PGE) deposits and Ni-PGE sulfide mineralization related to a dunitic body at Tulppio, and the Paleoproterozoic Lomalampi PGE-(Ni-Cu) deposit. We analyzed chromite separates from both mineralized and non-mineralized komatiitic rocks, bulk-sulfide separates, and country-rock black schist from one deposit, and for comparison, chromite separates from non-mineralized Archean komatiitic rocks from the Kovero and Kuhmo greenstone belts.We have observed open-system behavior of sulfides in three deposits, with their Re-Os isotope compositions indicating resetting at ca. 1.83–1.87 Ga by metamorphic events related to the Svecofennian orogeny. Most of the chromite separates, especially those with >10 ppb Os, retain their primary isotope compositions with near-chondritic initial 187Os/188Os ratios, indicating that their Os was derived from a mantle source with a chondritic Re-Os isotope evolution. These include the Vaara deposit, which yielded a chromite Re-Os isochron age of 2719 ± 140 Ma and low initial γOs of −1.2 ± 0.02, in spite of the evidence for the presence of mass-independent S isotope fractionation in this deposit, suggesting a low-Os, sulfur-bearing contaminant. In the case of the Lomalampi deposit, chromites yield an isochron with an age of 2058 ± 93 Ma and initial γOs of +0.9 ± 0.02, consistent with earlier isotope data from Central Lapland komatiites. However, one chromite from a mineralized cumulate gave a γOs(2050 Ma) value of +24 ± 18, indicating a minor/moderate degree of crustal contamination involving material from country rock black schists. This is also supported by earlier S isotope data. In the Archean Tainiovaara deposit, chromite also suggests crustal contamination (γOs + 13 ± 1), but country rocks are Os-poor Archean gneisses, leaving the source of radiogenic Os unclear, though it is possible that contamination occurred at a greater depth. Our results also provide evidence that the Re-Os age of the Ruossakero deposit is ca. 2.9 Ga, with the deposit likely representing komatiitic magmatism that is older than the komatiitic magmatism elsewhere in Finland. Re-Os results also confirmed that the mineralized Tulppio Dunite is Archean in age.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have