Abstract
This paper explores the events surrounding the imposition of the Maximum in 1793 against the larger backdrop of the prevailing tensions between Paris and its immediate neighbour the Seine-et-Oise over the question of subsistence. The paper argues that from a regional point of view the Maximum may be represented not as an ad hoc measure imposed by a reluctant Convention under pressure from an impatient populace, but as a much needed remedy to offset the growing imbalance between Paris and its neighbours in the matter of distribution of food grains. This alternative interpretation is then used as an entry point into the wider historiographical debate over the nature of the French Revolution. An analysis of the contrasting discourses used by Paris and the Seine-et-Oise in the course of their conflict reveals that the French Revolution was not inherently illiberal but was a multi-faceted phenomenon whose true nature is obscured by a Paris-centred historiography.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: European Review of History: Revue européenne d'histoire
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
