Abstract

From Athena Swan accreditations to Access and Widening Participation agendas, diversity training and renewed pedagogic approaches to inclusive learning, the higher education landscape is now awash with the language of ‘diversity’ as policy and practice. The institutionalisation of ‘diversity’ is a welcome method of inclusion, yet it is often reproduced as ‘happy talk’ (Bell and Hartmann 2007) that pacifies the call for meaningful structural and institutional change, silencing and even reinforcing the inequality it seeks remedy (i.e. Ahmed, 2012; Alexander, 2005; Archer, Hutchings & Ross 2003; Kirton, Greene & Dean 2007; Mohanty, 2003; Puwar, 2004). Taking these paradoxical dimensions of diversity as ethnographic and conceptual points of departure, this special issue seeks to unravel some of the everyday experiences, practices and policies encoded in diversity ‘speak’ and ‘diversity work’ (Ahmed 2012) across anthropology departments in the UK. By giving credence to accounts of the daily graft of ‘diversity work’, together with embodied and lived experiences of what ‘being diverse’ entails on the ground, we strive to productively mobilise decentred ‘situated knowledges’ (Haraway, 1988) in order to displace the continued centrality of white / elite / heteronormative / ableist reference points at the heart of much higher education institutional diversity strategies and inclusion agendas (cf. also Puwar, 2004). For us, the term ‘re-imagining’ is a call for positive political transformation in which we hope the difficult, uncomfortable - but hopefully - fruitful questions and critiques posed by papers in this special issue galvanise a space for diverse-led action. It is thus against this backdrop that we try to re-imagine diversity in a new light: to bear witness to those who live its effects and thereby reveal the potential to democratically and holistically re-structure anthropology from the ground up.

Highlights

  • Recent years have seen a substantial institutional and governmental impetus to increase access and ensure equal participation from what have been qualified as ‘underrepresented groups’ in higher education in the UK

  • We foreground the voices and perspectives of those who have too often been overlooked and / or disempowered within the UK academy and rarely encountered in published works. This includes contributions by undergraduate students in collaboration with their academic colleagues to reveal racism and intersectional bias in higher education pedagogic and collegiate practice (Bafo and Dattatreyan; Dawood and Reese); the critical reflections of a state school teacher engaged in widening participation activities from the rural margins of the UK (Dennehy); and PhD student testimonial of personal experiences of class discrimination (Dominique) and intersectional marginalisation (Delany) together with critical reflection on anti-racist and decolonised pedagogic practice (Agbetu) and anthropological methodologies (Balasubramanian; Bourke)

  • Their article calls for the burden of diversity work to be shared, and especially by those whose significant privilege in society means they are either rarely expected to engage in this labour or they can choose to participate with the option of always being able to walk away

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Recent years have seen a substantial institutional and governmental impetus to increase access and ensure equal participation from what have been qualified as ‘underrepresented groups’ in higher education in the UK. We foreground the voices and perspectives of those who have too often been overlooked and / or disempowered within the UK academy and rarely encountered in published works This includes contributions by undergraduate students in collaboration with their academic colleagues to reveal racism and intersectional bias in higher education pedagogic and collegiate practice (Bafo and Dattatreyan; Dawood and Reese); the critical reflections of a state school teacher engaged in widening participation activities from the rural margins of the UK (Dennehy); and PhD student testimonial of personal experiences of class discrimination (Dominique) and intersectional marginalisation (Delany) together with critical reflection on anti-racist and decolonised pedagogic practice (Agbetu) and anthropological methodologies (Balasubramanian; Bourke). It is against this backdrop that we try to re-imagine diversity in a new light: to bear witness to those who live its effects and thereby reveal the potential to democratically and holistically re-structure anthropology from the ground up

Contributions to the Special Issue
An anthropology for disruption as anthropology for change
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call