Abstract

The streamer discharge in water is a main object for studying the basic physical and chemical processes of an electric discharge in water. In this paper, the re-illuminations and the pause behaviors of a streamer filament of the microsecond pulsed streamer discharge in water with different conductivities (20 to 800 µS/cm) are studied by adopting a needle-plate electrode system and an ultra-high-speed camera system. The cause why the re-illumination of the streamer filament is difficult to detect by using the camera system as the water conductivity gets higher is discussed. It is found that the re-illumination alternately occurs among different streamer filaments, and two modes of the re-illumination are identified: one is that the whole filament quenches and then illuminates again; the other is that only the tip part of the filament quenches and then resumes the illumination. The appearance rate of the re-illumination of the streamer filament decreases rapidly as the water conductivity increases, and then drops to zero as the water conductivity exceeds 540 µS/cm. Within a water conductivity range of 20–800 µS/cm, the appearance rate of segmentation in shockwave pattern of the streamer filament is larger than 65%, indicating that the pause is a common behavior of the streamer filament. By measuring the difference in radius between two adjacent shockwave segments, the average pause period of the streamer filament is estimated at 157 ns, which is almost not affected by the water conductivity. As the water conductivity increases, the light intensity of the streamer filament increases rapidly. The light intensity of the streamer filament cannot decay to the noise level of the camera system during the pause period of the streamer filament as the water conductivity exceeds 350 µS/cm. The streamer filament produces glow on the light emission image, which makes it difficult to distinguish the “extinction and illumination” process by the camera system.

Highlights

  • Time for the light intensity of the streamer filament decaying to the noise level of the camera system

  • 通过分析 流光丝轴向光强分布发现, 随着水电导率的增大 流光丝的光强显著增大, 在流光丝暂停期间 (约 157 ns), 水电导率小于 350 μS/cm 时, 流光丝光强 衰减到相机分辨能力以下, 在发光图像上显示为熄 灭状态; 水电导率大于 350 μS/cm 时, 在流光丝暂 停期间内流光丝的光强度无法衰减到相机分辨水 平以下, 在相机获得的发光图像上看上去是持续发 光的, 难以分辨出流光丝“熄灭-再发光”过程

Read more

Summary

Introduction

您可能感兴趣的其他文章 Articles you may be interested in (2021 年 6 月 21 日收到; 2021 年 9 月 6 日收到修改稿) 本文利用四分幅超高速相机、采用 针-板电极结构、在 20—800 μS/cm 水电导率范围内研究了水中微秒脉冲流光放电流光丝的再发光和暂停行 为, 探讨了高水电导率下观测不到流光丝的再发光的原因. 随着水电导率 的增大, 观测到流光丝的再发光现象的频度急剧减小, 540 μS/cm 水电导率时降到零; 在 20—800 μS/cm 水 电导率条件下都可观测到流光丝伴生冲击波串分段现象, 冲击波串分段现象的出现频度在 65% 以上, 表明在 20—800 μS/cm 水电导率条件下流光丝的暂停是一种普遍行为. 通过测量两段冲击波的半径差得到流光的 暂停时间平均为 157 ns, 几乎不受水电导率的影响; 随着水电导率的增大, 流光丝的发光强度显著增大, 水电 导率大于 350 μS/cm 时, 流光丝暂停期间内流光丝的光强度无法衰减到相机分辨水平以下, 在相机获得的发 光图像上看上去是持续发光的, 难以分辨出流光丝“熄灭-再发光”过程.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call