Re-examination of the NDDO approximation and introduction of a new model beyond it

Abstract

The NDDO (neglect of diatomic differential overlap) approximation, a widely used basis for many semi-empirical molecular orbital (MO) approaches, is re-examined based on non-empirical frozen-core calculations on small molecules. An improvement going beyond the NDDO approximation is proposed. Our study shows that under the NDDO approximation, when the remaining non-DDO-type two-electron repulsion integrals (TERIs) are calculated using the basis set from the Löwdin orthogonalization of the valence atomic orbitals, the resulting total energies are much higher than those from the corresponding frozen-core ab initio calculations. On the other hand, when the remaining non-DDO TERIs are calculated using non-orthogonal valence atomic orbitals (similar to the Roby model), for most of the molecules calculated, the total energies are significantly lower than those from the corresponding ab initio calculations. Furthermore, we also find that for some molecules, the total energies thus calculated are higher than the corresponding ab initio results. The nonsystematic variation of the absolute errors in the total energy calculations is due to the fact that the core-electron and the electron-electron interactions are not treated in a balanced way in the NDDO approximation. A new model, which overcomes the deficiencies in the NDDO model, is proposed. In this model, a first-order correction term is added to the electron-electron Coulomb interactions, thereby improving the balance between the core-electron and the electron-electron interactions. Non-empirical test calculations show that the total energies from the new model are consistently higher than those from the ab initio calculation but closer to the ab initio results. We expect that the proposed new model would be useful in developing new high-quality semi-empirical MO approaches.