Abstract
Transcriptome profiling is widely used to infer functional states of specific cell types, as well as their responses to stimuli, to define contributions to physiology and pathophysiology. Focusing on microglia, the brain macrophages, we report here a side-by-side comparison of classical cell sort-based transcriptome sequencing and the ‘RiboTag’ method that avoids cell retrieval from tissue context and yields translatome sequencing information. Conventional whole cell microglia transcriptomes were found to be significantly tainted by artifacts induced by tissue-dissociation, cargo contaminations and transcripts sequestered from ribosomes. Conversely, our data highlight the added value of RiboTag profiling to assess the accuracy of Cre transgenic mice. Collectively, this study indicates method-based biases, reveals observer effects and establishes RiboTag-based translatome profiling as a valuable complement to standard sort-based profiling strategies.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.