Abstract
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & GynaecologyVolume 122, Issue 10 p. 1421-1422 BJOG Exchange Re: Balancing the efficacy and safety of misoprostol: a meta-analysis comparing 25 versus 50 μg of intravaginal misoprostol for the induction of labourSafety of 25-μg intravaginal tablet of misoprostol for the induction of labour César Hernán Meller, César Hernán Meller Obstetrics Division, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, ArgentinaSearch for more papers by this authorGustavo Hernán Izbizky, Gustavo Hernán Izbizky Obstetrics Division, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, ArgentinaSearch for more papers by this authorLucas Otaño, Lucas Otaño Obstetrics Division, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, ArgentinaSearch for more papers by this author César Hernán Meller, César Hernán Meller Obstetrics Division, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, ArgentinaSearch for more papers by this authorGustavo Hernán Izbizky, Gustavo Hernán Izbizky Obstetrics Division, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, ArgentinaSearch for more papers by this authorLucas Otaño, Lucas Otaño Obstetrics Division, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, ArgentinaSearch for more papers by this author First published: 26 August 2015 https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13512 The authors of the original article were invited to respond, but declined to do so. Read the full textAboutRelatedInformationPDFPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessClose modalShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL No abstract is available for this article. Volume122, Issue10September 2015Pages 1421-1422 RelatedInformation RecommendedBalancing the efficacy and safety of misoprostol: a meta‐analysis comparing 25 versus 50 micrograms of intravaginal misoprostol for the induction of labourK McMaster, L Sanchez-Ramos, AM Kaunitz, BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & GynaecologyOral misoprostol (100 μg) versus vaginal misoprostol (25 μg) in term labor induction: a randomized comparisonAshalatha Shetty, Iona Livingstone, Santanu Acharya, Pat Rice, Peter Danielian, Allan Templeton, Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica ScandinavicaLabor induction post‐term with 25 micrograms vs. 50 micrograms of intravaginal misoprostolM.M. Meydanli, E. Çalışkan, F. Burak, M.A. Narin, R. Atmaca, International Journal of Gynecology & ObstetricsVaginal misoprostol for induction of labor: 25 vs. 50 μg dose regimenM.T. El-Sherbiny, I.H. El-Gharieb, H.A. Gewely, International Journal of Gynecology & ObstetricsEfficacy and safety of intravaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone for labor induction at term: A systematic review and meta‐analysisAihai Liu, Jieqiang Lv, Yue Hu, Junzhe Lang, Luhang Ma, Wenbing Chen, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
