Abstract
While theorists assume that diversity affords positive potential, very little work has addressed this upside with most research focusing on its associated problems. Further, the dominant theoretical paradigm of social identity theory seems limited in its ability to advance prescriptive advice likely to generate truly positive and expansive outgroup attitudes. The present experiment compared a relational identity manipulation to recategorization, the collective identity manipulation most commonly prescribed in the diversity literature. Further, it included conditions of both direct and indirect outgroup contact. Results revealed a synergistic effect whereby both a relational identity and direct outgroup contact improve outgroup attitudes while the absence of both conditions, experienced by those with a collectivistic identity without direct outgroup contact, results in markedly worsened attitudes. Results are encouraging in their suggestion that a relational identity appears to provide an improved alternative to recategorization in general terms while offering particular promise in the extension of positive attitudes to those without direct outgroup contact. These benefits manifested themselves toward different targets on a number of measures. The experiment also has implications for our understanding of the underlying mechanisms responsible for the advantages identified.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.