Abstract

After a brief review of the crystallographic Fourier transform problem, this paper compares three methods for its computer implementation with reference to core-storage capacity and computation time: the classic method, the simple Fast Fourier Transform algorithms and a new method. The first method needs, especially for a macromolecular three-dimensional structure, too many operations and therefore too long a computation time and poor accuracy. The remarkable FFT algorithm, on the other hand, leads to large savings in computation time with a better accuracy, but using no crystallographic symmetry wastes too much storage capacity. The third method, using FFT but taking into account Friedel's law by means of a simple in situ process, approximately halves the storage capacity as well as the computation time.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.