Abstract
The goal of semantic web is to understand human language with meaning. Semantic web include metadata that is called annotation. RDF and OWL both languages have standard formats for the sharing and understanding of knowledge on the web. Ontologies also originate from Semantic Web. These RDF and OWL Ontology for web application like Library System of CIIT (Comsats Institute of Information Technology) of Lahore campus can be built. With the help of this ontology we can search the data, understand and customize the data, efficient reasoning support. These OWL ontologies include classes, properties, individuals and their instances. How these classes relate with each other. All the properties related to the Book Information System have set into the data type properties, object properties and annotations. In this research study we proposed the work related to RDF and OWL Ontologies comparison between RDF and OWL ontology and XML schema relationship between the cases of this ontologies, how this ontology was helpful in our web applications. We provide the best way of building of ontology for any web application and any other organization. When the ontology is build, result is obtained by the SPARQL queries with efficient reasoning support. This ontology is developed for CLS (Comsats Library System) in Lahore campus. Manipulation of different properties and then binding of protégé with eclipse to give support for user interface is important task. The results are best correctly gained through SPARQL query.
Highlights
Comsat has a number of campuses that are all over spread in Pakistan
The user may not have enough time to search separate hyperlinks that are generation in the traditional web. This difficulty can be solved by building ontology with the help of protégé tool that is open editor tool (Natalya and McGuinness, 2009; Jonathan, 2004; Michael Grobe, SIGUCCS, 2009)
Four reasons is that in the RDF and RDFs, special properties cannot declare in the model, while in the OWL, the special properties related to the classes and subclasses can set like function transitive etc (The Future of the Web is Semantic, 2005; Semantic Web Architecture, Year; Paul et al, 2007)
Summary
Comsat has a number of campuses that are all over spread in Pakistan. It has seven campuses in Pakistan. Web semantics has many languages like XML, UML, RDF, RDFs and OWL etc. Four reasons is that in the RDF and RDFs, special properties cannot declare in the model, while in the OWL, the special properties related to the classes and subclasses can set like function transitive etc (The Future of the Web is Semantic, 2005; Semantic Web Architecture, Year; Paul et al, 2007). For web for SPARQL Protocol and RDF Query Language The applications, this is better to use the OWL and RDF. Herbert (2002), the question what will be data sources used when we are going to build ontology it may b HTML, XML, RDF/RDFS and involved many other web semantic languages.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
