Abstract

The urgent need to accelerate the transition towards low-carbon energy is well understood. Government support for energy innovation has been an increasing focus of both policy and academic attention in recent years. The debate has focused on direct spending by governments on research and development (R&D). However, governments also support R&D indirectly, through tax credits. This source of government support has been overlooked in the academic and policy debate on energy innovation, in part because publicly available data on R&D tax credit expenditures typically do not enable the identification of spending specific to energy. This article provides the first published data on R&D tax credits in the energy sector, drawing on administrative data from Australia, Canada, Norway and the UK. This data shows that indirect support through tax credits can be a large source of support for innovation in fossil fuel extraction companies, though this differs by country. As a result, publicly available data on direct R&D spending by government can significantly understate government support for innovation in fossil fuel extraction. The article also presents patent data to show, for the UK and for Norway, that less than 5% of R&D activity in fossil fuel extraction firms is devoted to low-carbon technologies. The article concludes with the recommendation that governments should consider removing tax credit support for R&D activities that facilitate the extraction of fossil fuels.

Highlights

  • Considerable academic research and policy debate (Anadon et al 2017, Myslikova and Gallagher 2020) has focused on the role of publicly-funded research and development (R&D) for clean energy technologies

  • Publicly available data on direct government energy R&D spending can significantly understate actual government support for fossil fuel R&D. Taking these four countries as a whole in 2015, R&D tax credit support for fossil fuel extraction firms was larger than direct R&D support to fossil fuel technologies: i.e. the data on direct R&D support, which is typically the focus of public policy debate on energy innovation, understated public R&D support for fossil fuel innovation by more than half in that year

  • I use patent data to show, for the UK and for Norway, that less than 5% of R&D activity in fossil fuel extraction firms is devoted to low-carbon technologies

Read more

Summary

15 June 2021

Original content from Abstract this work may be used The urgent need to accelerate the transition towards low-carbon energy is well understood. Governments support R&D indirectly, through maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title tax credits This source of government support has been overlooked in the academic and policy of the work, journal debate on energy innovation, in part because publicly available data on R&D tax credit citation and DOI. This article provides the first published data on R&D tax credits in the energy sector, drawing on administrative data from Australia, Canada, Norway and the UK This data shows that indirect support through tax credits can be a large source of support for innovation in fossil fuel extraction companies, though this differs by country. Publicly available data on direct R&D spending by government can significantly understate government support for innovation in fossil fuel extraction. The article concludes with the recommendation that governments should consider removing tax credit support for R&D activities that facilitate the extraction of fossil fuels

Introduction
Findings
Discussion and conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.