Abstract

ABSTRACT The R&D policy instrument mix concept has become increasingly important for understanding how public R&D support drives firm-level R&D. To-date, empirical studies have conceptualised the R&D policy instrument mix as a static unit, whereby firms receive different R&D policy instruments at one point in time. However, firms can also receive different instruments in a sequence, over time. While potential sequencing effects are well rehearsed theoretically, this issue remains a major gap in the empirical literature. Our study evaluates, for the first time, how R&D policy instrument mix sequencing impacts firm-level R&D. We construct a unique dataset, comprising 8,556 unique firms, and 36,136 firm-year observations, over a 17-year period for Ireland. Our analysis focuses on two different R&D policy instruments (R&D grants and R&D tax credits) pursuing the same policy objective. We develop a novel approach to measure R&D policy instrument mix sequencing, focusing on the R&D policy instruments firms receive over a four-year time window. We implement this approach using a multi-treatment panel-data matching approach, which addresses issues of selection bias. Our results suggest that R&D policy instrument mix sequencing is highly effective at driving firm-level R&D, and that some sequences are more effective than others. These findings highlight opportunities to realise superior policy outcomes through targeted sequencing.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.