Abstract
Physical chemists reconcile the empirical theory of classical thermodynamics with the quantum nature of matter and energy when they recover thermodynamics from a statistical mechanical treatment of the individual particles' quantized eigenspectrum. The conclusion is that, when systems are very large collections of particles, interactions between adjacent systems are comparatively negligible, resulting in an additive thermodynamic framework where the energy of a composite system AB may be expressed as the sum of the individual energies of subsystems A and B. This powerful theory is consistent with quantum theory, and it accurately describes the macroscopic properties of sufficiently large systems subject to comparatively short-ranged interactions. Nevertheless, classical thermodynamics has its limitations. Its main drawback is the theory's failure to accurately describe systems not sufficiently large for the aforementioned interaction to be neglected. This shortcoming was addressed by the celebrated chemist Terrell L. Hill in the 1960s when he generalized classical thermodynamics by adding a phenomenological energy term to describe systems not captured by the additivity ansatz (i.e., AB ≠ A + B) of classical thermodynamics. Despite its elegance and success, Hill's generalization mostly remained a specialist tool rather than becoming part of the standard chemical thermodynamics corpus. A probable reason is that, in contrast to the classical large-system case, Hill's small-system framework does not reconcile with a thermostatistical treatment of quantum mechanical eigenenergies. In this work we show that, by introducing a temperature-dependent perturbation in the particles' energy spectrum, Hill's generalized framework is in fact recovered with a simple thermostatistical analysis accessible to physical chemists.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have