Rauber's sickle and not the caudal marginal zone induces a primitive streak, blood vessels, blood cell formation and coelomic vesicles in avian blastoderms.

Abstract

By using the quail-chicken chimera technique, we studied the reactivity and the eventual developmental or inducing capacities of the avian caudal marginal zone (in comparison with Rauber's sickle), when associated in vitro with different avian blastoderm components. If a fragment of quail sickle endoblast is placed on the caudal marginal zone of a whole unincubated chicken blastoderm, then a secondary miniature embryo will develop in this caudal marginal zone. The primitive streak and accompanying neural plate of the secondary embryo are directed peripherally into the caudal germ wall, away from Rauber's sickle. Thus, the 'mirror image development' indicates that the upper layer of the caudal marginal zone can react in the same way as the upper layer of the area centralis, because of the presence of sickle endoblast. A quail Rauber's sickle fragment placed on an isolated anti-sickle region always induces a primitive streak directed centrally. After prolonged culture, blood vessels and associated coelomic vesicles are formed. By contrast if a quail caudal marginal zone is placed on an isolated chicken anti-sickle region, the primitive streak, blood vessels and coelomic vesicles do not form. Thus, in contrast to the inducing effect of Rauber's sickle, the caudal marginal zone has no inducing effect by itself, even in the absence of the dominating effect of Rauber's sickle.