Abstract

Inflatables, such as rats, fat cats, and other caricatures, have been an arrow in the quiver of unions for quite some time. Plainly, the purpose of such attention‐getting balloons is to place public pressure on an employer who is the target of a union's discontent. An employer has limited options to respond to such demonstrations. What happens, however, when it is the customers of an employer who are targeted? It depends, as recently concluded by a New York federal court.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.