Abstract
To the Editor. —We commend the Society of Critical Care Medicine Ethics Committee 1 for its clear and insightful recent statement on the distribution of intensive care resources among individual patients. The statement rightly acknowledges resource scarcity and the subsequent potential for conflict between the value of intensive care for individual patients and other medical and nonmedical values, though it does not directly address the thorny question of how those competing values should be balanced. The statement also emphasizes the need for public disclosure of triage policies; we would add that the public should be given an opportunity to contribute to the formulation of such policies, at least in public hospitals. We agree with the committee that the concept of triage provides a better model for these decisions than the widely discussed concept of futility. Unlike futility, triage clearly connotes the evaluation of both benefits and burdens in a context
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
