Rationalizing Counterion Selection for the Development of Lipophilic Salts: A Case Study with Venetoclax.

Abstract

The use of lipid-based formulations (LBFs) can be hindered by low dose loading due to solubility limitations of candidate drugs in lipid vehicles. Formation of lipophilic salts through pairing these drugs with a lipophilic counterion has been demonstrated as a potential means to enhance dose loading in LBFs. This study investigated the screening of appropriate counterions to form lipophilic salts of the BCS class IV drug venetoclax. The physical properties, lipid solubility, and in vitro performance of the salts were analyzed. This study illustrated the versatility of alkyl sulfates and sulfonates as suitable counterions in lipophilic salt synthesis with up to ∼9-fold higher solubility in medium- and long-chain LBFs when compared to that of the free base form of venetoclax. All salts formulated as LBFs displayed superior in vitro performance when compared to the free base form of the drug due to the higher initial drug loadings in LBFs and increased affinity for colloidal species. Further, in vitro studies confirmed that venetoclax lipophilic salt forms using alkyl chain counterions demonstrated comparable in vitro performance to venetoclax docusate, thus reducing the potential for laxative effects related to docusate administration. High levels of the initial dose loading of venetoclax lipophilic salts were retained in a molecularly dispersed state during dispersion and digestion of the formulation, while also demonstrating increased levels of saturation in biorelevant media. The findings of this study suggest that alkyl chain sulfates and sulfonates can act as a suitable alternative counterion to docusate, facilitating the selection of counterions that can unlock the potential to formulate venetoclax as an LBF.