Abstract

Population growth, the impacts of climate change, and the need for greater water security have made the reuse of wastewater, including potable use, increasingly desirable. As interest in potable reuse of wastewater increases, a variety of processes have been proposed for advanced water treatment following conventional wastewater treatment. In all cases, the operation and performance of advanced water treatment facilities (AWTFs) is improved when the treated wastewater feed is of the highest quality that can be achieved and the advanced water treatment (AWT) processes are operated at a constant flow. One proven method of optimizing the performance of wastewater treatment facilities (WWTFs) is constant flow operation with no extraneous return flows other than internal process recycle flows, such as return settled solids. A number of approaches can be used to achieve constant flow including flow equalization, divided treatment trains, and satellite treatment. The ways in which constant flow wastewater treatment benefits both WWTFs as well as the AWTFs are considered with special emphasis on the ability to achieve predictable log removal credits (LRCs) for specific microorganisms. Actual performance data from constant flow WWTFs are used to illustrate how LRCs are determined.Practitioner points Constant flow WWTFs should be considered to produce the highest quality secondary effluent for AWT.Flow equalization, divided treatment trains, and satellite treatment can be used to achieve constant flow to optimize wastewater treatment in small and medium size WWTFs.Flow equalization can be used to maximize the amount of wastewater that can be recovered for potable reuse.Important benefits of constant flow for wastewater treatment facilities include economic and operational savings, stable and predictable treatment performance, energy savings, ability to optimize performance for the removal of specific constituents, and the ability to assign pathogen log removal credits (LRCs).Important benefits of constant flow and optimized WWT for AWTFs include economic and operational savings; less pretreatment needed, including energy and chemical usage; elimination of the need to cycle treatment processes; and added factor of safety with respect to the required pathogen LRCs.In large WWTFs, constant flow for AWTFs will typically be achieved by effluent diversion; depending on the effluent quality additional pretreatment may be needed.The design and implementation of WWTFs and AWTFs for potable reuse should be integrated for optimal performance and protection of public health.

Highlights

  • Interest in potable reuse is increasing throughout the world, as the amount of available fresh water has remained the same or has, in some cases, decreased, while the population dependent on the available water has grown

  • The advantages of constant flow wastewater treatment with no return flows for the production of treated effluent of the highest quality for further processing in an advanced water treatment facility have been presented and discussed

  • Constant flow can be achieved by flow equalization, the use of divided treatment trains, and satellite treatment

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Interest in potable reuse is increasing throughout the world, as the amount of available fresh water has remained the same or has, in some cases, decreased, while the population dependent on the available water has grown. The principal benefits of constant flow for wastewater treatment include (1) economic and operational considerations, (2) improved performance and increased process stability, (3) reduced energy usage, (4) ability to predict performance, (5) ability to implement new biological treatment processes, (6) ability to optimize performance of existing facilities for the removal of specific constituents, and (7) the ability to assign pathogen log removal credits (LRCs) for secondary WWTFs producing effluent for potable reuse. Improved process performance and stability Depending on how constant flow is achieved, improved process performance is achieved as a result of the utilization of the average design hydraulic retention times, enhanced primary sedimentation, concentration, and load dampening; dilution of toxic constituents; reduction of shock loadings; enhanced secondary settling; and improved chemical feed application where employed All of these measures are important in producing a high-­quality effluent for advanced water treatment (Tchobanoglous et al, 2014; WEF/ASCE, 2010). The ability to document the removal of Giardia cysts and Cryptosporidium oocysts is of significance with respect the overall LRC required by regulatory agencies, but it is reassuring to the public that the most effective treatment possible is being provided

Discussion
Summary
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call