Abstract
There is an abundance of historical and contemporary examples of consensual institutions that reduce the probability of adversarial conflicts between contesting parties. For instance, feudal lords in the medieval period supported monarchies which kept in check their mutual predatory tendencies. Contemporary nation states invest in the United Nations and NATO to contain conflicts between themselves. This paper experimentally investigates the feasibility and effectiveness of such an institution. We modify the two-agent ratio-form rent-seeking model to incorporate a pre-conflict stage in which participants voluntarily choose a level of public investment towards the establishment of the peacekeeping mechanism. A modified Tullock contest is played in the second stage, where the aggregate investment made in the first stage assists the victim in the case of a unilateral aggression. We find that the peacekeeping mechanism is effective in reducing conflict expenditures, and is least effective when the contestants initially have close but unequal endowments, as opposed to equal or widely unequal endowments.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
