Abstract
This paper extends Hartmann's skepticism about the heuristic value of the polarized terms "rational" and "irrational" lest they be used for future theory building. Clinically--now, as in ancient times--a close correlation exists between this polarity and that of common-parlance value judgments--"masculine/rational/positive" and "feminine/irrational/negative." Primitive ambivalence concerning the repudiation of femininity is explored here in both sexes. A suggestion is raised that it may be the female's capacity for pregnancy, rather than the infantile reaction to genital difference, that is the most vital underpinning of the age-old negative view of women.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
