Abstract

In the 61 years that niobium has been used in commercial steels, it has proven to be beneficial via several properties, such as strength and toughness. Over this time, numerous studies have been performed and papers published showing that both the strength and toughness can be improved with higher Nb additions. Earlier studies have verified this trend for steels containing up to about 0.04 wt.% Nb. Basic studies have shown that the addition of Nb increases the recrystallization-stop temperature, T5% or Tnr. These same studies have shown that with up to about 0.05 wt.% of Nb, the T5% temperature increases in the range of finish rolling, which is the basis of controlled rolling. These studies also have shown that at very high Nb levels, exceeding approximately 0.06 wt.% Nb, the recrystallization-stop temperature or T5% can increase into the temperature range of rough rolling, and this could result in insufficient grain refinement and recrystallization during rough rolling. However, the question remains as to how much Nb can be added before the detriments outweigh the benefits. While the benefits are easily observed and discussed, the detriments are not. These detriments at high Nb levels include cost, undissolved Nb particles, weldability issues, higher mill loads and roll wear and the lessening of grain refinement that might otherwise occur during plate rough rolling. This loss of grain refinement is important, since coarse grained microstructures often result in failure in the drop weight tear testing of the plate and pipe. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the practical limits of Nb microalloying in controlled rolled low carbon linepipe steels of gauges ranging from 12 to 25 mm in thickness.

Highlights

  • It has been over 61 years since the first production heat of a niobium (Nb) bearing HSLA strip steel was commercially produced in 1958 [1,2]

  • These studies have shown that at very high Nb levels, exceeding approximately 0.06 wt.% Nb, the recrystallization-stop temperature or T5% can increase into the temperature range of rough rolling, and this could result in insufficient grain refinement and recrystallization during rough rolling

  • The purpose of the current study was threefold: (i) to determine whether NbC could form during rough rolling and (ii) whether this precipitate might cause less than complete recrystallization during rough rolling, and (iii) lead to a larger slightly pancaked as-roughed austenite grain size resulting in non-optimum final austenite microstructure prior to transformation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

It has been over 61 years since the first production heat of a niobium (Nb) bearing HSLA strip steel was commercially produced in 1958 [1,2]. The contribution of Nb to high strength by grain refinement; solid solution strengthening of the various types of ferrite formed; and further strengthening of the ferrite by precipitation and dislocation-hardening through increased hardenability have all been chronicled in numerous papers and research studies [3,4,5,6,7,8]. The improvement in lowering the ductile-brittle transition temperature (DBTT) through the use of niobium is critically important in pipelines intended for low temperature service [9]. Much of this improvement is caused by the grain refinement of both the austenite during hot rolling, and the grain refinement of the ferrite during transformation upon cooling.

Objectives
Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call