Abstract

BackgroundRates of morphological evolution vary across different taxonomic groups, and this has been proposed as one of the main drivers for the great diversity of organisms on Earth. Of the extrinsic factors pertaining to this variation, ecological hypotheses feature prominently in observed differences in phenotypic evolutionary rates across lineages. But complex organisms are inherently modular, comprising distinct body parts that can be differentially affected by external selective pressures. Thus, the evolution of trait covariation and integration in modular systems may also play a prominent role in shaping patterns of phenotypic diversity. Here we investigate the role ecological diversity plays in morphological integration, and the tempo of shell shape evolution and of directional asymmetry in bivalved scallops.ResultsOverall, the shape of both valves and the magnitude of asymmetry of the whole shell (difference in shape between valves) are traits that are evolving fast in ecomorphs under strong selective pressures (gliders, recessers and nestling), compared to low rates observed in other ecomorphs (byssal-attaching, free-living and cementing). Given that different parts of an organism can be under different selective pressures from the environment, we also examined the degree of evolutionary integration between the valves as it relates to ecological shifts. We find that evolutionary morphological integration is consistent and surprisingly high across species, indicating that while the left and right valves of a scallop shell are diversifying in accordance with ecomorphology, they are doing so in a concerted fashion.ConclusionsOur study on scallops adds another strong piece of evidence that ecological shifts play an important role in the tempo and mode of morphological evolution. Strong selective pressures from the environment, inferred from the repeated evolution of distinct ecomorphs, have influenced the rate of morphological evolution in valve shape and the magnitude of asymmetry between valves. Our observation that morphological integration of the valves making up the shell is consistently strong suggests tight developmental pathways are responsible for the concerted evolution of these structures while environmental pressures are driving whole shell shape. Finally, our study shows that directional asymmetry in shell shape among species is an important aspect of scallop macroevolution.

Highlights

  • Rates of morphological evolution vary across different taxonomic groups, and this has been proposed as one of the main drivers for the great diversity of organisms on Earth

  • The strength of morphological integration (r Two-block partial least squares (PLS)) did not differ significantly among these ecomorphs, there was a trend for gliders to be marginally more integrated than the byssal-attaching and freeliving species

  • In spite of the strong phenotypic integration found between valves, we found that the differences in the shape between the left and right valves − the magnitude of directional asymmetry (DA) − varied substantially among species of scallops and relates strongly to ecomorph type, and that this variation in asymmetry followed a continuum across the life habits displayed by the various ecomorphs

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Rates of morphological evolution vary across different taxonomic groups, and this has been proposed as one of the main drivers for the great diversity of organisms on Earth. A central aim in evolutionary biology is to document the observed variability in the tempo of evolution in groups of closely related species and identify extrinsic and intrinsic factors pertaining to this variability This is possible because of the accumulation of large quantitative phenotypic datasets and advances in phylogenetic comparative methods [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. In a similar manner, elevated rates of phenotypic change are typically found in organisms occupying disturbed or novel environments (e.g., [29]) or facing high predation pressures [30, 31] Together these studies demonstrate that the habitat use and an organism’s environment affect the rate at which morphological diversity accumulates

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.