Abstract

Low-value services have limited or no benefit to patients. Rates of low-value service in public hospitals may vary by patient insurance status, given that there may be different financial incentives for treatment of privately insured patients. To assess the variation in rates of 5 low-value services performed in Australian public hospitals according to patient funding status (ie, private or public). This retrospective cross-sectional study analyzed New South Wales public hospital data from January 2013 to June 2018. Patients included in the sample were over age 18 years and eligible to receive low-value services based on diagnoses and concomitant procedures. Data analysis was conducted from June to December 2020. Hospital-specific rates of low-value knee arthroscopic debridement, vertebroplasty for osteoporotic spinal fractures, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, oophorectomy with hysterectomy, and laparoscopic uterine nerve ablation for chronic pelvic pain were measured. For each measure, rates within each public hospital were compared by patient funding status descriptively and using multilevel models. A total of 219 862 inpatients were included in analysis from 58 public hospitals across the 5 measures. A total of 38 365 (22 904 [59.7%] women; 12 448 [32.4%] aged 71-80 years) were eligible for knee arthroscopic debridement for osteoarthritis; 2520 (1924 [76.3%] women; 662 [26.3%] aged 71-80 years), vertebroplasty for osteoporotic spinal fractures; 162 285 (82 046 [50.6%] women; 28 255 [17.4%] aged 61-70 years), hyperbaric oxygen therapy; 15 916 (7126 [44.8%] aged 41-50 years), oophorectomy with hysterectomy; and 776 (327 [42.1%] aged 18-30 years), uterine nerve ablation for chronic pelvic pain. Overall rates of low-value services varied considerably between measures, with the lowest rate for hyperbaric oxygen therapy (0.3 procedures per 1000 inpatients [47 of 158 220 eligible inpatients]) and the highest for vertebroplasty (30.8 procedures per 1000 eligible patients [77 of 2501 eligible inpatients]). There was significant variation in rates between hospitals, with a few outlying hospitals (ie, <10), particularly for knee arthroscopy (range from 1.8 to 21.0 per 1000 eligible patients) and vertebroplasty (range from 13.1 to 70.4 per 1000 eligible patients), with higher numerical rates of low-value services among patients with private insurance than for those without. However, there was no association overall between patient insurance status and low-value services. Overall differences in rates among those with and without private insurance by individual procedure type were not statistically significant. There was significant variation in rates of low-value services in public hospitals. While there was no overall association between private insurance and rate of low-value services, private insurance may be associated with low-value service rates in some hospitals. Further exploration of factors specific to local hospitals and practices are needed to reduce this unnecessary care.

Highlights

  • Hospitals account for the highest proportion of health spending worldwide; optimal resource allocation in this setting is key to improving health system efficiency and sustainability

  • We explored the variation in rates of 5 low-value services within New South Wales (NSW) public hospitals

  • For patients with multiple episodes of care within a hospital stay, we considered them to be a patient with private insurance if any episodes were billed using private health insurance

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Hospitals account for the highest proportion of health spending worldwide; optimal resource allocation in this setting is key to improving health system efficiency and sustainability. One factor potentially influencing low-value care is private health insurance. In the US, commercial insurers negotiate reimbursement for procedures directly with hospitals and doctors, leading to large variation in reimbursements and generally higher profit margins for treating commercially insured patients rather than Medicare patients.[5,7] These financial incentives may motivate the provision of low-value care in insured populations, the findings from studies exploring this association are inconsistent.[5,7,8,9] While treatment decisions are likely influenced by patient and physician preferences, previous studies have not investigated differences or accounted for differences in hospital-level care—where such disparities are likely to occur

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call