Abstract

We study a multi-access variant of the popular coded caching framework, which consists of a central server with a catalog of N files, K caches with limited memory M, and K users such that each user has access to L consecutive caches with a cyclic wrap-around and requests one file from the central server’s catalog. The server assists in file delivery by transmitting a message of size R over a shared error-free link and the goal is to characterize the optimal rate-memory trade-off. This setup was proposed in [1] where an achievable rate and an information-theoretic lower bound were derived. However, the multiplicative gap between them was shown to scale linearly with the access degree L and thus order-optimality could not be established.A series of recent works have used a natural mapping of the coded caching problem to the well-known index coding problem to derive tighter characterizations of the optimal rate-memory trade-off under the additional assumption that the caches store uncoded content. We follow a similar strategy for the multi-access framework and provide new bounds for the optimal rate-memory trade-off R∗(M) over all uncoded placement policies. In particular, we derive a new achievable rate for any L ≥ 1 and a new lower bound, which works for any uncoded placement policy and L ≥ K/2. We then establish that the (multiplicative) gap between the new achievable rate and the lower bound is at most 2 independent of all parameters, thus establishing an order-optimal characterization of R∗(M) for any L ≥ K/2. This is in significant improvement over the gap result in [1], albeit under the restriction of uncoded placement policies. Finally, we also characterize R∗(M) exactly for a few special cases.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.