Abstract

The rate of change (RoC) of environmental drivers matters: biotic and abiotic components respond differently when faced with a fast or slow change in their environment. This phenomenon occurs across spatial scales and thus levels of ecological organization. We investigated the RoC of environmental drivers in the ecological literature and examined publication trends across ecological levels, including prevalent types of evidence and drivers. Research interest in environmental driver RoC has increased over time (particularly in the last decade), however, the amount of research and type of studies were not equally distributed across levels of organization and different subfields of ecology use temporal terminology (e.g. 'abrupt' and 'gradual') differently, making it difficult to compare studies. At the level of individual organisms, evidence indicates that responses and underlying mechanisms are different when environmental driver treatments are applied at different rates, thus we propose including a time dimension into reaction norms. There is much less experimental evidence at higher levels of ecological organization (i.e. population, community, ecosystem), although theoretical work at the population level indicates the importance of RoC for evolutionary responses. We identified very few studies at the community and ecosystem levels, although existing evidence indicates that driver RoC is important at these scales and potentially could be particularly important for some processes, such as community stability and cascade effects. We recommend shifting from a categorical (e.g. abrupt versus gradual) to a quantitative and continuous (e.g. °C/h) RoC framework and explicit reporting of RoC parameters, including magnitude, duration and start and end points to ease cross-scale synthesis and alleviate ambiguity. Understanding how driver RoC affects individuals, populations, communities and ecosystems, and furthermore how these effects can feed back between levels is critical to making improved predictions about ecological responses to global change drivers. The application of a unified quantitative RoC framework for ecological studies investigating environmental driver RoC will both allow cross-scale synthesis to be accomplished more easily and has the potential for the generation of novel hypotheses.

Highlights

  • It has long been established that organisms respond differently to ‘gradual’ and ‘abrupt’ treatments of equal intensity – the outcome depends on the rate of change (RoC) (e.g. Dallinger, 1887; Mast, 1910)

  • We identified the subset of papers investigating the most studied environmental driver in the driver RoC literature body and normalized by the total number of papers about temperature in the same fields and years

  • To respond to the challenges posed by global change, it is critical that we collect more experimental data relating to dynamic processes at multiple levels of ecological organization

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

It has long been established that organisms respond differently to ‘gradual’ and ‘abrupt’ treatments of equal intensity – the outcome depends on the rate of change (RoC) (e.g. Dallinger, 1887; Mast, 1910). Differences in soil heavy metal RoCs preclude comparisons about impacts on microbial communities: toxicology studies are frequently short term and ‘abrupt’ with the entire dose applied at once whereas environmental-monitoring studies involve a gradual increase in levels of heavy metals over time (Giller, Witter, & Mcgrath, 1998) Such toxicology studies often report a reduction in microbial respiration rates in response to addition of a toxicant whereas monitoring studies report contrasting basal respiration rates in treatment versus control plots and attribute the differences to changes in community structure rather than physiology. The existing experimental and theoretical work suggests that the RoC of environmental variables likely influences community-level responses In most of these studies, slower RoCs tended to alleviate negative treatment effects, for example, on competitive interactions (Fortelius et al, 2015a, 2015b), mutualistic interactions (Klironomos et al, 2005) and biodiversity (De Blasio et al, 2015) ( see Limberger et al, 2014). Changes in both the total amount of litter entering the stream as well as upstream processing of litter (Vannote et al, 1980) could impact downstream lotic communities dependent on the upstream transformation of carbon sources

PROSPECTS AND RESEARCH PRIORITIES
CONCLUSIONS
Findings
VIII. SUPPORTING INFORMATION

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.