Rasch validation of the revised body awareness rating questionnaire (BARQ-R) in adults with and without musculoskeletal pain

Abstract

BackgroundThe Revised Body Awareness Rating Questionnaire (BARQ-R) is a self-report measure of body awareness. First aim: evaluate the structural validity of BARQ-R with Rasch analysis in community-dwelling Americans with and without musculoskeletal pain. Subaim: validate a Rasch analysis of BARQ-R done in Norwegian adults with musculoskeletal pain, through a secondary analysis in our sample of Americans with musculoskeletal pain.MethodsBARQ-R has 12 items with scores ranging from 0 (completely disagree) to 3 (completely agree), with higher total scores reflecting lower degrees of body awareness. Through Rasch analysis, we evaluated unidimensionality, item hierarchy, and structural validity with item and person fit, targeting, person separation reliability (PSR), local item dependence (LID), differential item functioning (DIF), and principal components analysis of residuals (PCAR).ResultsWe recruited 623 adults with and without musculoskeletal pain (average age = 50.27 ± 17.25 years). After rescoring 1 item and deleting 3 items, the 9-item Rasch-based BARQ-R had no misfitting items, the hierarchical ordering of the items followed clinical expectations, 3 (0.48%) misfitting persons, person mean location: -0.62 ± 1.03 logits (max -0.53, min 0.72 logits), minimal floor effect (1.93%) and ceiling effect (0.48%), no DIF, and PSR = 0.72. LID was found in 5 item pairs. The PCAR’s eigenvalue was 2.18. The secondary Rasch analysis in 152 adults with musculoskeletal pain (average age = 52.26 ± 16.13 years), demonstrated that, after rescoring 2 items, BARQ-R had no misfitting items and only 2 (1.32%) misfitting persons, good targeting (person mean location: -0.36 ± 0.88 logits), minimal floor effect (0.01%), no ceiling effect (0.00%), and PSR = 0.75. LID was found in 6 item pairs. The PCAR’s eigenvalue was 2.47.ConclusionsBARQ-R had good item and person fit. PSR with items covering a limited logit range suggests that differing levels of body awareness are measured with only modest precision. Adding and revising items to cover a wider range of body awareness and to better address concepts of internal body awareness and body movements would improve BARQ-R’s utility. Further analyses are needed before BARQ-R’s use for research or in the clinic. In addition, future BARQ-R Rasch validation is needed in other populations with body awareness deficits, such as stroke or spinal cord injury.