Abstract

Abstract. Given the limited number of human GIS/image analysts at any organization, use of their time and organizational resources is important, especially in light of Big Data application scenarios when organizations may be overwhelmed with vast amounts of geospatial data. The current manuscript is devoted to the description of experimental research outlining the concept of Human-Computer Symbiosis where computers perform tasks, such as classification on a large image dataset, and, in sequence, humans perform analysis with Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs) to classify those images that machine learning had difficulty with. The addition of the BCI analysis is to utilize the brain’s ability to better answer questions like: “Is the object in this image the object being sought?” In order to determine feasibility of such a system, a supervised multi-layer convolutional neural network (CNN) was trained to detect the difference between ‘ships’ and ‘no ships’ from satellite imagery data. A prediction layer was then added to the trained model to output the probability that a given image was within each of those two classifications. If the probabilities were within one standard deviation of the mean of a gaussian distribution centered at 0.5, they would be stored in a separate dataset for Rapid Serial Visual Presentations (RSVP), implemented with PsyhoPy, to a human analyst using a low cost EMOTIV “Insight” EEG BCI headset. During the RSVP phase, hundreds of images per minute can be sequentially demonstrated. At such a pace, human analysts are not capable of making any conscious decisions about what is in each image; however, the subliminal “aha-moment” still can be detected by the headset. The discovery of these moments are parsed out by exposition of Event Related Potentials (ERPs), specifically the P300 ERPs. If a P300 ERP is generated for detection of a ship, then the relevant image would be moved to its rightful designation dataset; otherwise, if the image classification is still unclear, it is set aside for another RSVP iteration where the time afforded to the analyst for observation of each image is increased each time. If classification is still uncertain after a respectable amount of RSVP iterations, the images in question would be located within the grid matrix of its larger image scene. The adjacent images to those of interest on the grid would then be added to the presentation to give an analyst more contextual information via the expanded field of view. If classification is still uncertain, one final expansion of the field of view is afforded. Lastly, if somehow the classification of the image is indeterminable, the image is stored in an archive dataset.

Highlights

  • 1.1 Geospatial Big Data and Applications scenariosNowadays the rapid development of information technology has led to the tremendous growth of data from various geospatial sensors which can be defined as the era of big data (Li et al, 2016)

  • We perceive and process vast amounts of information visually at extremely high speed; it seems reasonable to combine this human ability with the speed of computers to build a HumanComputer Symbiosis (HCS) platform for processing geospatial data

  • We intend to check the feasibility of the Geospatial Imaging Event Related Potentials (ERPs) engine (GI-ERP) as it is depicted on Figure 1

Read more

Summary

Geospatial Big Data and Applications scenarios

Nowadays the rapid development of information technology has led to the tremendous growth of data from various geospatial sensors which can be defined as the era of big data (Li et al, 2016). Typical application scenarios of geospatial big data include but are not limited to: land use mapping (Joshi et al, 2016 ), change detection (Wang et al, 2016) , natural and manmade disasters monitoring (Cernove et al, 2016). Geospatial Big Data are composed of terrestrial geosensors (Reis, 2005), (Nittel et al, 2005), social media data (Esmaili et al, 2013), terrestrial and airborne LIDAR (Debie et al, 2020), aerial imagery from manned and unmanned (UAS) platforms, satellite Earth Observation Systems imagery with various spatial (Li et al, 2008), temporal (Stellmes et al, 2013), and spectral resolutions (Asadzadeh et al.,2016). Most current geospatial toolsets can be termed as a “human-in-the-loop” in spite of increased amounts of operations that are automated by computer algorithms; research in optimization of the geospatial analysts’ workflow can be important for overall productivity increase of geospatial systems and toolsets

Why human-computer symbiosis?
Experimental Data
Creating the Model and Results Obtained
EEG EXPERIMENT RESULTS
CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE RESEARCH
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.